Endless Needs…

We often crib about what we don’t have, even though in a way don’t know exactly how our lives would be different had we had it, and also the effects or consequences of us possessing “it “at that point of time. A thought on this subject may in a way be hypothetical, or even be too far from reality, its just that, those times when we long for “that” something we don’t have is exactly when, we can do without it. This theoretical or philosophical view of mine can again be viewed with two perspectives, the first one and the more realistic, just though a little selfish one would be the individual’s perspective in one of “those” situations and the other would be a global perspective where the whole community/ society is taken into consideration. Now let us look at both these together in a system which by default is stable.

An individual in one of “those” situations is naturally inclined towards achieving what he/she as an individual doesn’t have in an efficient manner, and thus he/she is frustrated with life at that particular moment when he/she as an individual doesn’t have what he/she wants; but considering that he/she as an individual strives to achieve what he/she as an individual doesn’t have, then is when the difference is made. Upon performing “that” act, would they, as individuals realize that in the process of reaching the goal, they affected more lives than one in a way which could either be alterable of unalterable. Further it would be interesting to note that, as both these effects reach a greater magnitude of audience “which” in this case is participative in the act of the change, hence the distribution of the said energy affects more lives than one, again in either a positive or a negative manner such that it balances the total entropy of the system maintaining it a constant Zero and keeping it stable. Thus we can discuss that these effects of change (which shall in the following discussion be considered as an introduction of a new element into the old system in consideration) as a if brought about by an external system would not only disturb the system but will need the expulsion of an equally weighted influence from the earlier stable system. This would in-turn mean that this new change will though affect the individual positively; it may have a rather profound effect on the society. Also considering the effects of the expulsion of the said influence from the “new” system would require it to be balanced by new expulsion from the “old” system, which may not be an exact match. Thus this change will affect more lives than one and consequently being a disturbing element, it shall preferably not be considered. Further, to maintain the equilibrium of all the isolated systems, existing freely inside a large stable system it would require that all activities be performed such that they make efficient and diligent use of all resources contained in that sub-system.

Hence the conclusion that what is not there was never meant to be…